Paradox and Perspective
Last week, I got the chance to sit in on one of Harvey Cox's classes, which was an amazing opportunity. Two other schools I've visited only let you sit in on big lectures, and I assumed this one would be the same. I apparently didn't read the course description well enough to know that the class size limit was 12, so I was a tad intimidated when I realized I would just be sitting around the table, participating along with everyone else.
Anyway, the course takes a biographical approach to Religion and Society in the 20th century. Each week they read a biography of a different religious figure and have a discussion. They were discussing Aimee Semple McPherson, and then getting an overview of Reinhold Niebuhr, who they would be discussing the next week. I liked what Prof. Cox and the chosen biographer had to say about Niebuhr being a theologian whose central theme was paradox. I'm going to completely butcher what Cox said, but he mentioned that for Niebuhr, "It isn't either this or that. It's both. It's not "neither"; it's both."
I just really like that because much of religious thought is full of paradoxes, but it is still true for me. It's refreshing and non-fundamental to see that two opposing things can exist and still be true. I think it speaks to our Christian faith as a whole. I mean, Jesus was both man and God. Mary was both a virgin and with child. David was both a murderer and a man after God's own heart. With our ability to reason, it's hard to see two paradoxes as both being true. It makes me think of that elephant poem, which is attributed to a lot of different authors, but I'll go with the one by Rumi (who was Muslim, and also brings out the point that non-Christians can also live out truth). Anyway, the poem has to do with the limits of our individual perspective.
"Elephant in the Dark"
Some Hindus have an elephant to show.
No one here has ever seen an elephant.
They bring it at night to a dark room.
One by one, we go in the dark and come out
saying how we experience the animal.
One of us happens to touch the trunk.
"A water-pipe kind of creature."
Another, the ear. "A very strong, always moving
back and forth, fan-animal."
Another, the leg. "I find it still,
like a column on a temple."
Another touches the curved back.
"A leathery throne."
Another, the cleverest, feels the tusk.
"A rounded sword made of porcelain."
He's proud of his description.
Each of us touches one place
and understands the whole in that way.
The palm and the fingers feeling in the dark are
how the senses explore the reality of the elephant.
If each of us held a candle there,
and if we went in together,
we could see it.
My anthropology professor at UGA, Sandra Whitney, used that poem as an example on the first day of class and I have never forgotten it. In closing, I guess I'll leave a few quotes by Niebuhr himself.
"I think there ought to be a club in which preachers and journalists could come together and have the sentimentalism of the one matched with the cynicism of the other. That ought to bring them pretty close to the truth." Reinhold Niebuhr (so I guess if I become a preacher and a journalist, I'll just be one big paradox)
"Life is a battle between faith and reason in which each feeds upon the other, drawing sustenance from it and destroying it." Reinhold Niebuhr
"Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary." Reinhold Niebuhr
